Open Forum...(15/9)

Genève Cluster...(1/6)

Small city big people. A week has empowered the drilling cell of navigation and orientation. Without any prospective mode of spatial existence re-engineering, I found myself retro-imitating my déjà-passé backpack nomadism. Displacement encourages my reinforced respect to Taoist style of destiny. Moving from the collectivism to the international node of Chung King shadow (more)...
...you learn about yourself. It is the simplest way to diagnoses one’s materialistic need out of nothing. The city is internationalised, and it carries enjoyable talk in every spot, despite the varying level of profound perception and recognition. It is calm, and peaceful, as reflected by the enclosed lake. People practise their small dreams with big steps. Like every urban city, it digests the urge of time into its way of expression – a fair and unbiased motive with sincere gesture, but it is located too far from the spots of conflicts and unrest…

UNESCO & Cantonese...(15/2)

The question is simple: why UNESCO does not recognise Cantonese as a language? An intuitive reflexion for me when going through the application page of the official website. An intuitive answer could be that Cantonese is not that important, or that UNESCO does not really count Cantonese as an asset of heritage. That may be too ironic. The Cantonese Opera has been recognised by UNESCO as the intangible cultural heritage of mankind last October...
Exposing myself in the international arena of globalisation and collective development, the identity as a person from Hong Kong denotes much contemplation. I still have not truly consolidated my thinking about this, but as a reflexion, the trait of Hong Kong is definitely a very interesting subject to be self-envisioned and self-promoted...